Soziale Naturbeziehungen und die Vergesellschaftung der Landschaft

13.10.2025

Soziale Naturbeziehungen und die Vergesellschaftung der Landschaft.Soziologische Impulse zu biobasiertem Wirtschaften in Spanien, Finnland, Estland und Deutschland

Social relationships with nature and the societalisation of the landscape.Sociological insights on biobased economic activities in Spain, Finland, Estonia and Germany

Dennis Eversberg und Philip Koch stellen zentrale Konzepte und Erkenntnisse aus ihrer empirischen Forschung zu sozialen Naturbeziehungen im Rahmen des Projekts „Mentalitäten im Wandel (flumen)“ vor. Sie erläutern, wie die Gruppe die mentalen Dimensionen sozioökologischer Transformationen in vier soziologischen Fallstudien zu biobasierten Wirtschaftspraktiken in verschiedenen europäischen Regionen untersucht und die Ergebnisse systematisiert hat, um ein Konzept sozial spezifischer, situierter Formen des mentalen und praktischen Bezugnehmens auf das Außer-Menschliche zu entwickeln.

Dieses Konzept ist hilfreich, um Konflikte und Spannungen um die Transformation von Landschaften durch wirtschaftliche Aktivitäten als Ausdruck und Reaktion auf die expansive Dynamik moderner kapitalistischer Gesellschaften zu verstehen. Zur Veranschaulichung werden die Fallstudien aus Deutschland, Finnland, Estland und Spanien herangezogen. Dabei liegt ein besonderer Schwerpunkt auf dem Olivenanbau in Südspanien, wo eine jahrhundertealte Form der Gestaltung von Landschaft für menschliche Zwecke von verschiedenen Seiten unter Druck geraten ist. Die Unterschiede in der Art und Weise, wie Menschen „ihre“ Natur konzeptualisieren, so die Schlussfolgerung, können uns viel über die Zukunft der Menschen und der Pflanzen in der Region – sowie auch der Gesellschaft im Großen – verraten.

In this talk Dennis Eversberg and Philip Koch will introduce core concepts and insights from their empirical research on social relationships with nature within the project „Mentalities in flux (flumen)“. They explain how the group investigated the mental dimensions of socio-ecological transformations in four sociological case studies on bio-based economic practices in different European regions, and systematised the findings to come up with a concept of socially specific, situated ways of mentally and practically engaging with the extra-human.

This conception is helpful in understanding how conflicts and tensions surrounding the transformation of landscapes through economic activity are expressions of and reactions to the expansionary dynamics of modern capitalist societies. The case studies from Germany, Finland, Estonia and Spain are then drawn on for illustration, with a special focus on the case of olive cultivation in Southern Spain, where a centuries-old form of shaping landscapes for human purposes has come under pressure from various sides. The differences in how people conceptualize „their“ nature that emerge can tell us a lot about the future of people and the crop in the region – as well as of society more broadly.

Short Bios

Dennis Eversberg 

is Professor for Sociology with a focus on Environmental Sociology at Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main. He studied Sociology, Social Psychology, Political Science and Law, University of Hannover, graduation with a Diplom in Social Sciences in 2005. He was awarded the dissertation prize of  the German Sociological Association (DGS) in 2014 after completing his dissertation at Friedrich Schiller University, Jena. From 2019 until 2024 he headed the BMBF junior research group ‚Mentalities in flux. Social imaginaries in modern circular bio-based societies‘ (flumen) at the Institute of Sociology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena.

Philip Koch

is a sociologist and has worked as a researcher and PhD candidate in the project „Mentalities in flux (flumen)“ from 2019 until 2025 at the Friedrich-Schiller-University in Jena. His doctoral thesis deals with the social relationships with nature of olive farmers in Southern Spain, his general research interests, however, also emcompass political ecology, societal nature relations, bioeconomy and modernization theory.

The lecture series „Walks through living landscapes. Perspectives from three positions“ / Spaziergänge durch Lebendige Landschaften. Perspektiven aus drei Positionen has been conceived by Daniela Ortiz dos Santos, Carsten Ruhl, and Tim Pickartz through a collaboration between the the Center for Critical Studies in Architecture (CCSA) and the Museum Giersch der Goethe-Universität (MGGU).

In the scope of the exhibition SOLASTALGIE, this event is a cooperation between the CCSA and the MGGU.

Free of charge / Kostenfrei

Visiting Myself

27.11.2024

„We all know the feeling of ambivalence. The word comes from Latin; composed of ambo and valere, it means: both are valid. If it does not become a life principle that inhibits us in all decisions, ambivalence is a force that we can use. Because ambivalent feelings are a signal. Like a subtle alarm bell, they remind us that we can step out of our beloved courant normal. Today we like to call this “moving out of the comfort zone”. But what does that mean? The artist Zilla Leutenegger (*1968 in Zurich) deals with precisely such themes, with feelings, atmospheres and observations of ambivalence. She is one of the most important Swiss artists of her generation and exhibits her works worldwide. She is represented in major art collections and last year was invited by the NZZ to design a newspaper edition and a limited art edition. In her work she has developed an alter ego that bears her name, Zilla“.

Bio:

Born in Zurich in 1968, Zilla Leutenegger was working for a fashion house in Hong Kong when she decided to pursue a career as an artist. She returned to her native city, and in 1995 began studying at the Hochschule für Gestaltung und Kunst, where she graduated in 1999. During this period, she also became a video assistant in the Department of Architecture at the ETH (Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule) in Zurich. The artist soon began dedicating herself to drawing, which she likes for the immediacy of the gesture, and to video, which enables her to bring her works to life.

Since her early days, the artist has been creating collage-like juxtapositions between filmed images, projected images, mural drawings and sometimes even real objects, within three-dimensional installations that fill the space with shadows and light. A pioneer in the artistic use of digital technology, she is especially known for her “video drawings”—videos that are enhanced with drawings and manipulated by computer. Made up of short, looping sequences, their scenarios are reduced to simple actions.

Being the sole protagonist in her creations, which lie midway between autobiography and roleplay, Leutenegger essentially re-enacts domestic scenes or familiar memories. She takes moments drawn from everyday life and transforms them into an art of intimacy infused with poetry. However, she approaches the representation of the private sphere in a deliberate spirit of distance. The superimposition of several mediums itself moves us away from reality.

In the era of self-overexposure and wilful voyeurism, Zilla Leutenegger’s projections are devoid of any exhibitionism or narcissism. They reveal the calm beauty that resides in the simplicity of our lives, like fragments of our presence in the world.

Her work has been presented in several solo exhibitions (Museum Franz Gertsch, Burgdorf, 2014; Pinakothek der Moderne, Munich, 2015; Musée Jenisch, Vevey, 2016), and can be found in the collections of several institutions, such as the Aargauer Kunsthaus, the Kunsthaus Zurich, the Kunstmuseum Basel and the Museum Kunstpalast in Düsseldorf. Zilla Leutenegger lives and works in Zurich and Berlin.

.

This Talk has been conceived by Daniela Ortiz dos Santos and Carsten Ruhl, in the scope of the Lecture Series HOUSING AND…  in cooperation with the Museum Giersch der Goethe-Universität. It invites a diverse group of guests to examine Housing in between architectural production, the historical, socio-political and territorial context, the heritage and cultural making processes, as well as the public space and the public debate.

Download the program here

Register for remote participation via Zoom here

Dwelling With Class – Building Structures of Classism in Architecture

02.11.2024

Dwelling and class are interrelated and have been mutually dependent since (at least) the formation of a discourse about dwelling in modernity. The distinctions between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ forms of dwelling and ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ ways of living are part of a (modern) aesthetic tradition that is intertwined with both moral principles and a significant production of images in art and architecture. This can be critically questioned from a class-conscious perspective: to what extent are economic and social structures made in/visible here? How are class relations re/produced in images of dwelling, floor plans, interior design, architecture and urban planning? We encounter the imperative of a supposedly ‘correct’ way of living and dwelling in both, idealized images in art and architecture as well as in lifestyle magazines and home journals, TV series and on Instagram. Here, ideas of class relations are perpetuated. The models of bourgeois dwelling as an unmarked norm continues to shape the common notion of this ‘proper’ dwelling, which is usually identified as heteronormative, small-family and white. This talk aims to bring together various perspectives that critically examine dwelling in terms of class relations. Through examples from the history of art, architecture and design as well as (current) artistic and activist practices, it aims to put aesthetic, social and political interrelationships between dwelling and class into perspective. What role do art, architecture and (social) media play in conveying images of dwelling and class relations? How can gender differences, racism and class hierarchies be analytically intertwined, both historically and currently? What proletarian, revolutionary or emancipatory housing designs have existed and why are they rarely part of the discourse?